Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats: Key Takeaways

Beyond the final whistle, the true story of the Bears-Commanders rivalry lies in the box score and the players who defined the game. This October 13, 2025, Monday Night Football clash at Northwest Stadium was a nail-biter, with the Bears edging out a 25-24 victory to improve to 3-2, while the Commanders fell to 2-3. The hype around these young rosters—featuring second-year quarterbacks Caleb Williams and Jayden Daniels—lived up to expectations, delivering a game full of momentum swings, turnovers, and clutch plays. For NFL fans, fantasy players, and bettors, this matchup offers plenty of data-driven insights into player efficiency, workload, and tactical trends. Here, we’ll dive into the chicago bears vs washington commanders match player stats to uncover the “why” behind the numbers.

Key Points

• The Bears’ defense forced three turnovers, including an interception and two fumble recoveries, which proved decisive in a one-point win—research suggests turnover margins often dictate close games like this.
• Caleb Williams and Jayden Daniels showcased their dual-threat abilities, but Daniels’ three touchdown passes were overshadowed by costly mistakes, highlighting the risks in aggressive play-calling.
• D’Andre Swift’s explosive performance (108 rushing yards, 67 receiving yards, 1 TD) dominated the ground game, while the Commanders’ secondary struggled with big plays allowed.
• Both teams’ red zone efficiency was middling, with the Bears converting field goals in key spots; evidence leans toward special teams reliability as a separator in tight contests.
• Snap counts revealed workload shifts, like Zach Ertz seeing heavy usage for Washington, pointing to evolving personnel packages amid injuries.

Quarterback Performances

Caleb Williams delivered a solid outing, completing 17 of 29 passes for 252 yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions, while adding a rushing score. His 98.6 passer rating reflected efficient decision-making, though three sacks (16 yards lost) exposed protection issues. Jayden Daniels, meanwhile, went 19-for-26 with 211 yards and three touchdowns but threw one pick and lost a fumble, leading to a 119.2 rating tempered by turnovers. Daniels’ mobility shone with 52 rushing yards, but the mistakes underscore the learning curve for young signal-callers.

Offensive Standouts

D’Andre Swift led all rushers with 14 carries for 108 yards (7.7 average) and added two catches for 67 yards and a touchdown, totaling 175 scrimmage yards—the game’s high. On the receiving end, Luther Burden III hauled in four catches for 51 yards, while DJ Moore contributed 42 yards on three receptions. For Washington, Zach Ertz was Daniels’ go-to with six grabs for 43 yards and a score, and Chris Moore added 46 yards and a touchdown.

Defensive Highlights

The Bears’ front seven generated three sacks, with Gervon Dexter Sr. notching 1.5, and forced key turnovers, including Jaquan Brisker’s 32-yard interception return. Tremaine Edmunds led with 13 tackles (80.9 PFF grade). Washington’s defense sacked Williams three times but couldn’t force a turnover, allowing 386 total yards.

Special Teams and Hidden Metrics

Kicker Jake Moody’s 4-of-5 field goals, including the game-winner, were pivotal for Chicago. Third-down conversions were low for both (Bears 3/10, Commanders 3/8), but Chicago’s zero turnovers versus Washington’s three flipped the script.

Beyond the final whistle, the true story of the Bears-Commanders rivalry lies in the box score and the players who defined the game. This October 13, 2025, Monday Night Football showdown at Northwest Stadium wasn’t just another entry in the NFL schedule—it was a pivotal clash for two teams building around dynamic young quarterbacks. The Bears, now 3-2, clung to a slim playoff hope in a competitive NFC North, while the 2-3 Commanders continued to show flashes of potential but struggled with consistency in the NFC East. The hype surrounding Caleb Williams and Jayden Daniels, both in their sophomore seasons, added layers of intrigue, as did roster tweaks like Chicago’s addition of Luther Burden III and Washington’s acquisition of Deebo Samuel. Readers will gain a granular understanding of player efficiency, workload distribution, and defensive standouts through this chicago bears vs washington commanders match player stats analysis, perfect for fantasy leaders or those dissecting best individual performances in Bears vs Commanders game.

Quarterback Duel: Breaking Down the Passing Efficiency

Pocket Presence and Completion Rates

The quarterback battle lived up to its billing, with Caleb Williams and Jayden Daniels trading blows in a game that hinged on efficiency and poise. Williams completed 17 of 29 passes (58.6%) for 252 yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions, earning a 98.6 passer rating. His yards per attempt (YPA) sat at 8.7, bolstered by 194 yards after catch (YAC) from his receivers, showing trust in his playmakers to turn short throws into gains. Daniels, on the other hand, was sharper in completion percentage at 73.1% (19/26) for 211 yards, three touchdowns, and one interception, posting a 119.2 rating. His YPA was 8.1, with 70 YAC, but his air yards (204 intended) highlighted a more vertical approach compared to Williams’ 246 intended air yards. In a rookie quarterback comparison stats Bears vs Commanders (now sophomores), Daniels edged in touchdowns but Williams’ clean sheet—no picks—kept Chicago in control.

Under Pressure: Sack Rates and Scrambling

Pressure told a tale of two protections. Williams faced it on 27.3% of dropbacks (9 pressures), taking three sacks for 16 yards but scrambling once for four yards and adding a one-yard rushing touchdown. Daniels saw less heat (11.4% pressure rate, four pressures) but still absorbed three sacks for six yards; his six scrambles averaged nine yards each, totaling 52 rushing yards to extend drives. Daniels’ mobility (10 carries overall) kept Washington’s offense alive, but his two fumbles (one lost) under duress proved costly. Williams’ bad throw rate (17.2%) was higher than Daniels’ (4.2%), but fewer drops (two each) kept both afloat.

Skill Position Standouts: Receiving and Rushing Leaders

The Ground War: Backfield Touches and Efficiency

Chicago’s rushing attack overwhelmed Washington’s front, amassing 150 yards on 27 carries (5.6 average) with one touchdown. D’Andre Swift dominated with 14 touches for 108 yards (7.7 average), including 71 yards before contact and one broken tackle—his success rate in short-yardage shone through. Kyle Monangai added 19 yards on five carries. For the Commanders, Jacory Croskey-Merritt led with 17 attempts for 61 yards (3.6 average), but Daniels’ 52 yards on 10 carries (5.2 average) provided the spark. Washington’s ground game compared poorly to Chicago’s, with only four first downs from rushes versus Chicago’s six, underscoring how the Bears’ line created better lanes.

Aerial Assault: Targets and Catch Rates

Target shares revealed quarterback trusts. For Chicago, Olamide Zaccheaus led with six targets (two catches, 24 yards), but Swift’s three targets yielded 67 yards and a 55-yard touchdown (target share ~10%). DJ Moore (five targets, three catches, 42 yards) and Rome Odunze (five targets, two catches, 32 yards) were reliable, with Burden III’s four-for-four (51 yards) boasting a perfect catch rate. Washington’s Zach Ertz commanded six targets for six catches (43 yards, one TD, 100% catch rate), while Chris Moore (five targets, three catches, 46 yards, one TD) stretched the field. Deebo Samuel’s five targets netted just 15 yards, showing limited YAC (2.5 average).

Defensive Impact: Tackles, Turnovers, and Pressure

The Front Seven: Disrupting the Script

Chicago’s defense disrupted Washington’s rhythm with three sacks and three tackles for loss (TFL), led by Gervon Dexter’s 1.5 sacks and Montez Sweat’s forced fumble. Tremaine Edmunds racked up 12 tackles (three solo, nine assists), while T.J. Edwards added nine. Washington’s front seven countered with three sacks and four TFLs, with Frankie Luvu (one sack, one TFL) and Bobby Wagner (nine tackles, one TFL) standing out. Pressures beyond the box score: Bears’ Montez Sweat (five pressures) and Commanders’ Von Miller (0.5 sack) added hidden impact. In Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders match player stats defensive breakdown, the Bears’ nine takeaways over recent games highlight their opportunistic edge.

Secondary Performance: Pass Deflections and Interceptions

The Bears’ secondary forced the game’s momentum shifts, with Jaquan Brisker snagging an interception (32 yards) and one pass deflection (PD). Kyler Gordon recovered a fumble, contributing to three turnovers that swung field position. Washington’s Quan Martin led with two PDs and five tackles, but zero interceptions allowed Chicago’s big plays (e.g., 55-yard TD). Tackling woes plagued both—Bears missed opportunities in run support, while Commanders allowed 194 YAC.

Hidden Metrics: Snap Counts and Special Teams

Workload Trends and Personnel Packages

Snap counts in chicago bears vs washington commanders match player stats and snap counts revealed strategic rotations. For Washington (offense: 65 snaps), Jayden Daniels and the O-line played 100%, while Zach Ertz (60%) saw a heavy tight end package. Croskey-Merritt (66%) shouldered the backfield load amid injuries. On defense (64 snaps), Bobby Wagner and Frankie Luvu played every snap, highlighting their every-down roles. Chicago’s details weren’t as granular, but Swift’s dual-role touches suggest increased rotational use for Monangai (lower snaps implied).

Special Teams Contributions

Special teams flipped field position subtly. Chicago’s Jake Moody went 4/5 on field goals (long: 48), including the game-winner, and 1/1 on extra points. Washington’s Matt Gay hit 1/2 field goals (53-yarder) and 3/3 extra points, but a miss loomed large. Return yards: Bears’ Devin Duvernay (120 on five kicks), Commanders’ Luke McCaffrey (127 on four). Washington’s blocked field goal was their first since 2024, but it couldn’t offset turnover woes.

Conclusion

In the end, Caleb Williams “won” the quarterback duel with mistake-free play, D’Andre Swift owned the scrimmage yards battle, and the Bears’ defense claimed the most impact with turnovers. These stats project Chicago as a turnover-forcing contender if their pass rush sustains, while Washington needs secondary tweaks to support Daniels’ upside. Share your “Player of the Game” in the comments or check upcoming fantasy projections—did Swift lock in as a must-start?